In February 2009, it was widely reported that the Local Business Listing service provided by Google had been compromised. Apparently, individuals were hijacking local listings by masquerading as a local business, yet driving web traffic to another site altogether. How could Google let this happen!? Who has the sophistication to get to the heart of Google’s infrastructure at such a business-critical level? And how could the tech giant be infiltrated by some hacker stealing your prospects and the hard work that was driving them to your Web site?
It turns out that the sophistication necessary for such a ploy is a smoke screen, too. Meaning, anyone who can type and surf the Web can do it. The local business listing compromise is quite simple in nature:
1. Register with the Google service.
2. Enter the exact same physical information relating to your business as another listing of like-nature.
3. Once Google has merged the new data with the existing listing and verified the accuracy (with the hijacker no-less) then the perpetrator merely changes the Web address associated with the listing.
Now, when someone searches for your product or service and then clicks on your local listing, the resulting traffic is driven to the Web site of the hijacker’s choosing.
Supposedly, Google closed the loop hole; however, the issue has reared its head recently in the UK and has been dominating message boards for weeks.
Here is a description as one victim puts it:
“When I go to my Google local listing center and try to edit my listing, it still has my information. [But] when I click the “See your listing on Google Maps” link, the competitor’s information keeps showing up. Somehow they have gotten control of my listing and they keep changing it.
“Every time I change my listing back they go ahead and change it again. I have tried everything I could think of, but I have not received any help for the last 5 weeks.”
One would think that this would be a simple fix, but Google has not complied with public outcries for help. Their solution: give us a call and let us know. Sure Google will augment or delete the listing, but what good does that do – the violators just go back and claim the listing again.
In short, Google’s inaction points toward the “head-in-the-sand” approach. They recognize the issue but aren’t dedicating resources at the present time to fixing the situation. Multiple bloggers have noted that support numbers specifically for the issue are non-existent and discussion board questions directed toward Google remain largely un-responded to.
Here are a few lessons business owners can take away from this:
• First, give people the service you’d expect to receive. The “well you get what you pay for” – or get for free in this instance – mentality just doesn’t fly. Especially not from Google.
• Secondly, the more successful your business becomes, the more you should look out for your customer.
• Thirdly, dedicate a lot of time to delivering products and services that serve the best interests of you customers – not your business.
It’s been long recognized (and satisfaction numbers tied to revenue don’t lie) that when a business pleases its core audience with great products and services that serve the customer’s needs above the business’ needs, everybody flourishes. Maybe Google should take a cue from customer demands.

For the nearly 14 million children in the US living below the federal poverty level, the holidays can be especially difficult, with food and shelter taking precedence over Xbox and Barbie. WebVisible recently teamed up with the American Red Cross to reach out to approximately 1,600 local families from communities in Orange County, California for the 21st Annual Children’s Safety Festival.
“The holidays are traditionally a time of giving, so it is wonderful to be able to brighten a family’s day by giving a child a present,” said Nargess Akhavi, director of the Red Cross Youth Services department. “But we could not have provided these gifts without the work of our volunteers and the generous donations by WebVisible and Westbound Communications.”


